Whenever I ask someone “How are you doing?” I always find it completely weird when their response is “I can’t complain.” Some folk even get emphatic and expressive with that statement by prefacing their weird-to-me response with an “Oh,” as in “Oh, I can’t complain.” Why is that response weird to me you may query…well, I have three reasons. I’ll share them with you now in an unprioritized order:
Number 1. The response to my question
is not true, i.e., it’s an L.I.E., because anyone can complain – no one with
breath and the ability/capability of speech is incapable of complaining –
complaining is one of the easiest things anyone can do; one does not need to be
trained in the “art” of complaining (though I’ve actually met people who could
definitely qualify as having mastered that art) and to do so requires no amount
whatsoever of skill.
Number 2. The response to my question
does not remotely answer the question.
An “I can’t complain” response to a question asked regarding the well-being
of the person asked, is like asking a politician if it’s raining (or any
question for that matter) – the response you’d get would likely be a fully
verbose dissertation designed to deflect or some type of thesis-defending
statement (which I think might be the same thing…sometimes).
Number 3. The response to my question
means…well…I really don’t know what it means…I mean, in relation to what I
asked: “How are you doing?” – what does or is “I can’t complain” supposed to
mean? What in the in the H E
double L’s is that response supposed to convey? It most assuredly doesn’t answer my question…it
doesn’t inform me as to how one is doing – it gives me no barometer of frame of
reference in the tee-ninchiest bit as to how one is doing figuratively,
literally or otherwise. It’s simply an
evasive and misleading response (see Point 2 with emphasis on the politician
Sooooooo, in my complete and
undeniably self-evaluated quantification of wisdom, I have a developed a
response to that particular response – “Oh yeah…what else can’t you do?
Imagine be asked a question in the
vein of “What can’t you do?” in a
myriad of communicative situations…like a job interview, or a juror
qualification screening, or maybe a conversation concerning commitment in a
The thing about the word “can’t” in
literally any setting, is that it’s almost always indicative of
limitations. There’s nothing wrong with people
knowing their limits or limitations – I’m certainly not against that – I’m just
not a promoter of accepting or readily addressing, i.e., publicly claiming and
proclaiming them; because in many cases our limitations can be overcome, pushed
out further…stretched out farther…
For example – if unable to do so now,
we could totally learn how and achieve the ability to properly answer a simple
question…….but if we can’t….we need to introspectively ask ourselves (wait for
Within the government, within the Department of Justice, the Department of Defense, you have practically eliminated any training or any use of the term ‘radical Islam.’ That’s what we’re facing. LTG Michael T. Flynn
I will not abridge my freedoms so as not to offend savages, freedom of speech is under violent assault here. Pamela Geller
It is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated,
to impose its law (sharia) on all nations and to extend its power to the entire
planet. Muslim Brotherhood founder Hassan Al-Banna
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize. Voltaire
Fox News is no longer run by CFR member Rupert Murdoch. It is now being controlled by Rupert’s eldest
son, 47-year-old Lachlan Murdoch.
Although Lachlan says his politics closely resemble his father’s, Fox
News and Fox Business are unarguably leaning to the left. Though Lachlan hired
West Wing stalwart Hope Hicks, staffers believe he is likely to nudge the
network away from its close marriage to Trump, and they have lost many of their
famous male hosts to #MeToo claims against them.
Bill O’Reilly left the network in April of 2017 after numerous claims
of sexual harassment lawsuits against him.
Roger Ailes, Chairman and CEO of Fox News had several women make
charges against him. He died shortly
after he resigned.
Eric Bolling was accused of sending lewd pictures to female colleagues
at the Network.
Unfortunately, none of these charges ever went to court. The alleged perpetrators just resign. Even black host Charles Payne was charged
with sexual inuendoes, but returned to his scheduled program after a month of
Were all guilty? We don’t know,
and never will, but having a Y chromosome doesn’t make someone a lousy human
If sexual innuendos do not remove hosts, charges of racism often work, two things the left loves to use against their enemies. But a guaranteed removal is telling the truth about Islam. As Pamela Geller has said, “Truth has become the new hate speech.”
Fox News and Censorship
Chris Farrell of Judicial Watch used to be featured on Fox programs every week. However, in October of 2018, Chris was on Lou Dobbs show regarding the southern border migrants and made the statement, “A lot of these affiliates are getting money from the Soros occupied State Department, and that is a great concern. If you want to start cutting money, cut there.”
He was subsequently banned as being anti-Semitic for stating that Soros was funding the migrant affiliates.
Congressman Louie Gohmert was on Stuart Varney’s Show December 6, 2018, and he made this statement, “George Soros is supposed to be Jewish, but you wouldn’t know it from the damage he’s inflicted on Israel, and the fact that he turned on fellow Jews and helped (the Nazis) take the property that they owned.”
Representative Gohmert was undoubtedly supporting Chris Farrell and exposing Soros for what he really is…someone strictly interested in the globalization of America.
Attorney Sidney Powell, author of the book, Licensed to Lie, was on Lou Dobbs Show last November 2018 and made the statement, “We simply cannot tolerate continued invasion of this country when Americans suffer every day, national debt is exploding, we have diseases spreading that are causing polio-like paralysis of our children.” Lou Dobbs immediately took her to task and cut her off.
We are in the midst of an invasion from people of various backgrounds,
from various countries in Central America and South America, and just
independently (with some days of separation apart), there’s a story of a
shockingly unforeseen increase in polio cases in the United States.
No one can seemingly figure this out or where it’s coming from. Then
there’s another story of mass numbers of people from various parts of the
world, South America and Central America having this polio like disease. Common
sense tells you there’s a relationship here.
The CDC and others have established the fact that new cases of polio and other diseases America previously cured and stamped out, are now showing up again. There is official linkage to undocumented people arriving in the country and being released. How can we not make the connection? Sidney Powell is right.
Fox News Caves to Sharia
The recent outrage surrounding Judge Jeanine Pirro’s remarks concerning the hijab is a reflection of the abysmal degree to which common sense is under assault in America.
While discussing Muslim Congresswoman Ilhan Omar’s anti-Israel remarks with Nancy Pelosi, Pirro said, “This is not who your party is. Your party is not anti-Israel. She is. Think about this, she’s not getting this anti-Israel sentiment doctrine from the Democratic Party, so if it’s not rooted in the party, where is she getting it from? Think about it. Omar wears a hijab which according to the Koran 33:59 tells women to cover so they won’t get molested. Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?
There was nothing wrong with Judge Jeanine’s question. Islamic “fashion” has political consequences. The hijab is a symbol and it is a symbol of the fact that the woman wearing it is fully committed to the sharia. It is a symbol that says to infidels that they are kafirs. Kafir is an Arabic term meaning “infidel.” The term refers to a person who rejects or disbelieves in Allah or the tenets of Islam. When you see a woman with a hijab, you are looking at the politics of Islam as it has operated for over 1400 years.
There has been jihad against the kafirs for 1400 years; it is a history of annihilation, death and suffering. They are antithetical to freedom.
Terrorism became much more frequent in such societies as Indonesia, Egypt, Algeria, and the U.K. after the hijab became prevalent among Muslim women living in those communities. Link
The reason for this correlation is clear: Islamic sharia commands jihad (terrorism) against unbelievers no less than it commands Muslim women to don the hijab. Where one proliferates—evincing a societal adherence to sharia—so too will the other naturally follow.
So just why is it that with any
other politician we are allowed to ask personal and religious questions. When John Kennedy ran for president, everyone
was concerned that his Catholic faith would interfere with his political
decisions and he was constantly questioned, but we are considered Islamophobic
if we ask questions like Judge Jeanine asked? Ilhan Omar should be asked the following
questions regarding her visceral hatred of Israel and the Jewish people:
Will you repudiate the attacks upon Israel by Hamas and Hezbollah?
Do you believe Israel has a legal and moral right to exist behind safe and definite borders?
Don Boys recent article asked many more legitimate questions, but Omar’s vitriolic diatribe against Jews needs to cease or she should be expelled. She was neither reprimanded nor censored for her deeply ingrained bias. The only consequence of her bigotry has been an innocuous resolution against hate speech. She has not been removed from any Congressional committees.
And now of course, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is calling on all advertisers to drop Fox News until the network fires hosts Jeanine Pirro and Tucker Carlson due to comments by both hosts that CAIR called “Islamophobic.” This is sharia and how Islam conquers and controls.
None of the Muslims in Congress have sworn allegiance to the
Constitution on the Bible. This
tradition of being sworn into office to swear on the Bible is because our
founding document, the Declaration of Independence, states that our rights are
given to us by the God of the Bible. Anyone who swears on any other book, like
the Koran, is swearing an illegitimate oath.
Congressmen Andre Carson (D-IN) and Keith Ellison (D-MN) both used the
Koran. Congresswomen Ilhan Omar (D-MN)
and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) took their oaths of office on the Koran.
The reason their oath is illegitimate is that the book upon which they swore teaches that the only acceptable religion is Islam, and they can lie (Taqiya) in order to advance Islam. When they swear on the Koran they are lying, knowing that the law of Islam does not allow freedom of religion.
Fox Muslim Attacks
Hufsa Kamal is a Pakistani American, born in England and
raised in Tennessee. She is a producer
for Bret Baier on Fox News, and has a long history of vicious attacks on conservatives
including Michelle Malkin, Candace Owens, Dan Bongino and Charlie Kirk.
She took to twitter to excoriate Judge Jeanine for asking
Speaker Pelosi if Ilhan Omar’s allegiance is to the Constitution or the Koran,
and claimed that many Muslims work at the Fox Network.
Fox found it necessary to condemn Pirro’s remarks and said they have “addressed the matter” with Pirro. It appears that Fox will continue to cave to sharia.
New Hires at Fox
Former Speaker Paul Ryan and Formula One Group executive chairman Chase Carey will join Rupert Murdoch, Lachlan Murdoch, and Jacques Nasseras members of the powerful Fox board. Paul Ryan is married to Janna Little a liberal, left wing progressive, anti-Constitutional, big government George Soros supporter who voted for Barack Hussein Obama twice. Ryan was the VP candidate with neo-con Trotskyite and pro-abort, Willard Mitt Romney in 2012. During his time as Speaker of the House, he fought President Trump at every turn, and it became obvious he was pro-amnesty and pro-open borders.
Donna Brazile is joining Fox News as a contributor. She was the former Chairman of the Democratic National Committee. When former Fox host Megyn Kelly asked Brazile about passing debate questions to Hillary Clinton so she’d be one-up during debates against Donald Trump, she blatantly lied to Kelly. Now she’s going to work for the very network she lied to.
The Jew Who Died for
Ilhan Omar’s anti-Semitism belies the fact that if not for a
Jew who gave his life, she may not be in America and in politics. Lawrence Freedman went to Somalia in 1992 as
part of the U.S. led relief effort to help relocate tens of thousands of Somali
refugees to escape starvation, famine and civil war that turned Somalia into a
failed state in the early 1990s.
Freedman was a U.S. Army veteran from Vietnam, and original member of the Green Beret. He reached the rank of sergeant major and eventually became an instructor. In 1990 he joined the Central Intelligence Agency and in 1992 he was sent as part of an advance team to prepare the way for American troops in Somalia. On December 23, two weeks after the troops had arrived, Freedman became the first American killed as part of the relief effort. Thousands of Somali refugees who live in Omar’s district had their freedom and security paid for with the blood of American soldiers – 22 of them, including Lawrence Freedman.
The Number One Cable Network is no longer teetering toward the left but is now an active part of it. Brazile’s arrival in the aftermath of Fox News suspending Judge Jeanine Pirro, all for asking questions about radical Somalian activist Ilhan Omar on her “Justice” show, is not only a slap in the face to Pirro and her many followers, but a slap in the face to the network’s many conservative viewers. Link
“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” Abraham Lincoln
Occasionally, I look back through the Bunker archives to see what I was on my mind back then. The archives are a journal of sorts. Sometimes I’m surprised when something I wrote 15 years ago is as relevant today, or maybe even more so, than it was originally. In 2005, I wrote Internal Rot for JD’s Bunker, the ancestor of American Journal. Relevant today? You decide.
I was passing a semi pulling tandem trailers when I clawed
at the CD button to switch off the screeching talk radio. The cab of my
pick-up truck filled with Beethoven’s Moonlight Sonata. Yes
Beethoven! You gotta a problem with that!? In my rearview mirror, I
saw a woman yakking on a cell phone. She was following me so close that I
could not see the headlights on her minivan. After passing the semi, I
flipped on my right turn signal indicator. The semi driver blinked his
headlights at me and I started to drift back into the slow lane. Before I
completed the lane change, Ms. mini-van was half a truck length past me.
She glared, a furrowed brow showing above her designer sunglasses and appeared
to mouth something about my dear departed mother. A Kerry/Edwards
campaign sticker adorned the back window of her van. Tailgating her was a
bright red pick-up truck with a “W-04” sticker in the window. Just
as close behind him was an irritable looking driver, with a 10
O’clock 2 O’clock white knuckled grip on the steering wheel of a
small SUV. The bumper sticker proclaimed, “Jesus is my copilot.”
He’d be safer riding with me I thought. Concluding that 3 of 5 rush hour
drivers belong in an insane asylum, I slouched and focused on the music.
A friend of mine, and my
historical authority of choice sent me an email about one of my recent columns. His lesson for me was that throughout human
history great societies have fallen because they first destroyed themselves
from within. Internal
rot is the descriptive term he used adding that when the failing society is at
its lowest point, outside forces will end it.
My commute and screeching
talk radio illustrate where we are. We’ve lost civility and are so intent on
demonizing one another for our beliefs that we can’t focus on our roots or a common
purpose – freedom and securing our country for example. If you still have a 2004 Presidential campaign
sticker on your car, you are part of the problem. You’re trapping us in time, keeping us hostage to
emotions and diverting us from important issues – sounds like a politician’s
resume doesn’t it. And,
if your copilot is supposed to put you above the fray, your actions should
demonstrate that you are.
The most basic leadership principle is being the example. The led reflect the example of the leaders. My drive home shows Americans following the example of those we elected to Congress to lead us, bolstered by senseless and endless Red State, Blue State political polls and media nonsense – liberal and conservative alike. A look at the 911 hearings, steroid follies and recent cabinet confirmation hearings should be enough to convince anyone that the most destructive combination in America is an egomaniacal politician and a television camera. It’s more obvious each day that you and I – Mr. and Ms. liberal Democrat, conservative Republican and proclaimed Independent – have elected and sent to Washington a collection of people not concerned about the problems facing our country. Their concern instead is power at all costs. When political leaders focus more on obtaining power and destroying political opposition than they do solving problems – which seems to be the focus of our currently non-functioning political system – the result is political rot. We are watching the decay of what is supposed to be the world’s greatest representative republic.
Moral relativism has saturated our society. Many believe there are no absolutes when it comes to right or wrong. They see behavior in shades of gray in conflict with others who view behavioral absolutes of black and white. The chasm between the two grows. Many manmade laws of our country are a product of moral relativism. They contradict the Judeo-Christian values on which our country was founded and often the laws of nature itself.
Moral relativism is why we
are not raising our children properly. Recent examples of out of control children and
adolescents in schools demonstrate that. We pump our kids up with MTV and junk food then
try to calm them with Prozac and Ritalin. We send them to school dressed as thugs and
connect their brain housing groups to MP3 players and cell phones. We baby sit them in Internet chat rooms. They don’t know math, science, history or current
this how we prepare them to confront the most complicated and dangerous world
in human history – and to preserve our country? More likely, we are preparing them to accept what
follows the rot.
We have the power to fix what
is wrong – you and I. We
can lop off rotten limbs and cauterize wounds, but once the roots of our way of
life – our political system, our morality and how we raise our children – begin
to rot, we might consider how soon we’ll need to start learning Chinese.
worked as a “bus boy” (politically incorrect—oh well) in my teens. I was fast,
thorough, and didn’t break dishes. I’ll never forget something my boss said to
me. “You are so good at bussing tables. Is your goal in life to be a
professional bus boy?”
thought about my answer, even though, in reflection, it was probably a
rhetorical question. I responded. “I want to be a professional at any and every
job I do.” Because of that approach to work, I did not remain a professional
Webster definitions of the word “professional” varies. They include, but are
not limited to, the following:.
exhibiting a courteous, conscientious, and generally
businesslike manner in the workplace
engaged in by persons receiving financial return
following a line of conduct as though it were a profession
As bus boy, I felt I
satisfied all three of these definitions. Funny how these definitions don’t
directly refer to an academic degree. Geez, maybe there’s more to being a
professional than a college degree.
My new manager of corporate communications had just graduated from college. She was ten years my junior. The only reason I bring up her age is that I had ten years of working experience that she lacked. But that’s okay. What wasn’t okay was her attitude of superiority, which I considered unprofessional.
I was editor of a company
newsletter and had been doing that for several years prior to her arrival. When
I brought my draft newsletter to her for her signoff, she took it and kept it
for several days, causing an unnecessary rush on the printer. When she did
return it, she had bled all over it. I recall her one recurring punctuation
edit was moving the period to the outside of an end quotation mark. I asked her
what her source was for doing that. She said it was because she had a degree in
journalism and had published many newsletters at college, and I didn’t have a
college degree. Great reasoning? I don’t think so.
My next question got me a
nastygram for insubordination. “Please tell me what writing source tells you to
put the period after the end quote.” She walked away.
That afternoon I gathered
the dictionary, the Chicago Manual of Style, the AP Stylebook, and several
other reference books. I flagged the punctuation issue in each and placed them
on her desk. I told her I would not change that punctuation unless she could
show me her reference, because I wanted to preserve my professionalism. Then I
asked her to please bring in several of the newsletters she published in
college, so I had a better idea of her preferences for layout and style. She
never did bring them. She merely wrote me up with a ding in my personnel file.
I’m proud of that ding. I asked nicely, professionally. I didn’t care if she
was young, inexperienced, and had her bachelor’s. I just wanted to do things
Since I lack the academic
credential, I found myself carefully researching things that some degreed
“professionals” seem to take for granted. They are right because they have the
degree, and that’s good enough for them. It isn’t good enough for me.
In my spare time, I wrote
for no pay at all just to get a portfolio together. It was a tough road, but it
paid off in the long run—emphasis on “long.” Please don’t misunderstand me. I
am all for higher education. If I had had a degree in combination with my work
ethic, I might have had more doors opened and reached financial goals decades
sooner. But education is what you make of it. Some party their way through
college and manage to graduate by the skin of their teeth. Some cheat. Some
breeze through college because they’re really smart. Some must work extra hard
to pass. Many just give up and drop out.
Through my survival instincts, I quickly learned ways to help me overcome my lack of credentials. I explained emphatically to prospective employers that I’m smart enough to apply what I know, confident enough to admit when I don’t know, and always determined to learn quickly what I need to know. Ignorance is not knowing. The word “ignorance” gets such a bad rap. We are all ignorant in some regard since no one knows everything. However, choosing to remain ignorant is just plain unprofessional, on the edge of stupid. And, as my surrogate brother says, you can’t fix stupid.
I also stressed the importance of a good work ethic and potential to wear more than one hat. I even offered to work for a probationary period for less money just for the chance to prove myself and the value I could bring to the job. I always got hired. Good and honest communication is critical to success, with or without a college degree.
We encouraged our daughter to go to college but also warned her that we would not support failure. When she ended up on academic probation, we cut the money. We’re very proud of her because, quite a few years later, she had funded her education and graduated, even though she was older than many graduates. It may have taken her longer, but she was determined. She is the first in our family to earn a college degree. My mother and father both quit while in high school. My husband also quit high school. He earned his GED and further education in Navy Nuclear Power School, which eventually landed him a senior engineer position with a major corporation. With many businesses, experience and application trump credentials. Although I did graduate from high school, I wish I had had the opportunity to go to college decades ago. From what I see of today’s culture, I know that a degree doesn’t necessarily validate a person’s intelligence or work ethic. Unfortunately.
Someone once told us that
we must live in a “good” school district to be sure our daughter got a quality
education. Although public schools have their drawbacks, I have concluded that
education and the ability to learn comes from within oneself and with help and
encouragement of family. Even with some substandard teachers and schools, I
assured our daughter that she could learn as much or as little as she wanted.
There was always the library for research, the newspaper for current events
(that’s questionable these days), listening to others and being able to analyze
sources. Learning is a continual element of life if we accept the fact that it
isn’t always obtained traditionally. We stop learning and we stop living.
Maybe I’m a professional
learner. I see every person in our lives as a teacher, whether they realize it
or not. There’s always something to learn. Every drive we take we can learn
from what we see out the window. Every task, whether at home, at work or at
play, can teach. How can we do things better, faster, smarter, or more
productively? How can we communicate better, with truth and information, with
clarity and lack of ambiguity? How can we do better, for ourselves, for our
loved ones and friends, for our employer? Professionalism is the link to answer
all these questions.
Now you know more about me
than you ever thought you would—or ever cared to know.
A bureaucrat is the most despicable of men, though he is needed as vultures are needed, but one hardly admires vultures whom bureaucrats so strangely resemble. I have yet to meet a bureaucrat who was not petty, dull, almost witless, crafty or stupid, an oppressor or a thief, a holder of little authority in which he delights, as a boy delights in possessing a vicious dog. Who can trust such creatures? Marcus Tullius Cicero
Politicians are not born; they are excreted. Marcus Tullius Cicero
The above quotes from Cicero were long ago, as is this quote from President George Washington, the Father of our Nation at his Farewell Address September 19, 1796, “However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.”
Today is no different than the days of Cicero who died 43 years BC, and Washington who died in 1799. See the Book of Ecclesiastes.
The Twelve Betrayals
Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer believe spending $5 billion for a wall is a waste of money, but $155 billion per year in support to illegals is a human right. The twelve republicans who went against our President’s wishes to secure our border and protect American citizens from terrorists, drug pushers, child traffickers, MS-13 gangs, and criminal aliens have every excuse in the book, but none of them can withstand the scrutiny of Trump’s supporters.
How many outcries did we hear when past presidents proclaimed multiple national emergencies? Very few! Here’s the list all the way back to President Jimmy Carter.
The National Emergencies Act (NEA) (Pub.L. 94–412, 90 Stat. 1255, enacted September 14, 1976, and signed by Republican President Gerald Ford, (codified at 50 U.S.C. § 1601–1651) is a United States federal law passed to end all previous national emergencies and to formalize the emergency powers of the President.
The following twelve Senators who voted against our President’s National Emergency were NeverTrumpers.
The following comments about the Senators who betrayed our President match the order of the photos. These Senators and more disavow the Republican party platform of pro-life and a border wall, both of which were secured at Republican conventions by Phyllis Schlafly, founder of Phyllis Schlafly Eagles. These Senators are some of the “Kingmakers” Phyllis spoke about in her book, A Choice Not an Echo. They are not Constitutional Conservatives.
Sen. Roger Wicker (Mississippi) Wicker said in a statement earlier this week: “The precedent we set this year might empower a future liberal President to declare emergencies to enact gun control or to address ‘climate emergencies,’ or even to tear down the wall we are building today.” Wicker, an Air Force veteran, won re-election comfortably last fall in a state Trump carried by nearly 20 points in 2016.
Sen. Marco Rubio (Florida) Marco used the same excuse as Wicker. However, in 2011, Rubio hoped to polish his foreign policy credentials for an eventual presidential campaign, and so he thoroughly backed Hillary Clinton’s War on Libya. Following the murder of Gaddafi, Rubio, McCain and Graham celebrated with the rebels they helped to arm, just a year before these rebels attacked the embassy in Benghazi. We know the rest of the story. And Rubio loved the H-1B Visas for foreign aliens who replaced American workers at Disney World, after they had to train them! He actually has proposed that we triple the Visas. Of course, Disney is one of Rubio’s biggest financial boosters.
Sen. Rob Portman (Ohio) Portman had worked with Mike Lee on the compromise resolution. The two-term senator said that while he supported Trump’s request for border wall funding, an emergency declaration is not necessary to secure those funds, and that the declaration would set a “dangerous precedent.” Sure, protecting Americans from criminal illegals is beyond your understanding. His association with Mike Lee lets us know Portman is another NeverTrumper.
Sen. Susan Collins (Maine) Ahhh yes, Susan Collins who voted for Justice Kavanaugh, and was applauded. However, this pro-abort Senator has close ties to both of the Bush presidents. And now, National Collins-mania reached a frenzy after a recent appearance on Maine Public Radio, in which she seemed to endorse the idea of the Senate Intelligence Committee subpoenaing Trump’s tax returns as part of its investigation into ties with Russia.
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) Lisa Murkowski is another pro-abort Senator. The Republican platform is pro-life, but you’d never know it by some of the Republicans in the House and Senate.
Sen. Pat Toomey (Pennsylvania) Toomey replaced Arlen Spector in the Senate. He is an anti-gunner, he wants laws tightened, as though the guns and the second amendment are the problems. Democrat Joe Manchin and Toomey joined in a proposal for universal background checks for gun purchases, which failed. He has disagreed with Trump many times, and like the rest of these 12, he claims the National Emergency is a “separation of powers issue.” It didn’t seem to bother him when used by previous presidents.
Sen. Roy Blunt (Missouri) Blunt claims he too is concerned about the precedent Trump’s National Emergency would set. Apparently, it didn’t bother Blunt when Presidents Clinton, Bush or Obama used the National Emergency Act which was signed by President Gerald Ford in 1976. Senator Blunt was a Congressional Representative from 1977 to 2011 when he became a Senator.
Sen. Lamar Alexander (Tennessee) Good old Lamar, the man who joined with our corrupt “Christian Conservative” Governor Bill Haslam, owner of the FBI raided Pilot Oil/Flying J to promote state internet sales taxes. Senator Alexander agreed with Obama Education Czar Arne Duncan regarding common core standards, and Skinnerian behavioral training in our government schools. For more information on Alexander, read my four-part article on this neo-con Trotskyite.
Sen. Mitt Romney (Utah) Willard Mitt Romney absolutely hates Donald Trump, despite the fact that Trump endorsed and funded Romney when he ran against Obama in 2012. Romney’s running mate was former Speaker Paul Ryan, another NeverTrumper. While Governor of Massachusetts, Romney was ahead of Obama in promoting government-controlled healthcare, which financed abortion with a $50 co-pay and funded abortion statewide through taxpayer monies. He opposed a Massachusetts Defense of Marriage Constitutional amendment, and said homosexuals should be allowed in the boy scouts. Governor Romney officially celebrated “Gay-Straight Youth Pride Day,” and sat on the board of directors for a leading purveyor of pornography without opposing the corporation’s exploitation of women. As for Smart Growth and UN Agenda 21, Romney is all for it. Link
Sen. Rand Paul (Kentucky) “What is underappreciated is their passion for freedom, and their commitment to ideas. Unlike many crony capitalists who troll the halls of Congress looking for favors, the Kochs have consistently lobbied against special-interest politics.” The Senator said this right after he announced he was running for President in April of 2015. I believe Rand’s comments stem from the fact that he may have received Koch funding for his presidential run.
Like the Kochs, Rand Paul is a libertarian, but Rand claims to be pro-life, yet he finds no problem with pro-aborts like the two brothers. Koch-sponsored libertarianism means open borders, legal dope and prostitution, abortion and gay rights, extreme pornography, an American military withdrawal from the rest of the world, and “free trade” with Russia and China. Link
Senator Paul is promoting a Constitutional Convention as are the Kochs who massively fund American Legislative Exchange Council, an organization who has promoted a con-con for decades, and which was founded by the first President of Heritage Foundation. Link
Sen. Jerry Moran (Kansas) Moran is just like the rest of the neo-cons, he believes the law passed by Congress giving the President National Emergency powers is unconstitutional. Senator Moran voted against President Trump’s 2017 executive order imposing a temporary ban on entry to the U.S. to citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries. Moran only announced his support for Trump after he became the presumptive nominee.
Sen. Mike Lee (Utah) Lee has never supported Trump and tried his best, along with Ken Cuccinelli, to derail him from becoming the nominee. Now, Lee has introduced legislation to curb the president’s power to declare a national emergency. Under Lee’s proposal, if a president were to declare a national emergency, Congress would have to approve it within 30 days or it would automatically expire. The Senator loves free trade, loves H-1B Visas, and supported legislation that would bring more Muslims into America. Link Lee has joined with democrats like Durbin and Schumer to vote against mandatory prison sentences for deported illegal aliens who enter our country again. This bill was in response to the illegal who killed Kathryn Steinle and had re-entered the U.S. five times.
President Trump is fighting to protect American citizens from criminal illegal aliens, and from the destruction of this country via the Islamic refugee resettlement programs. The Socialist Democrat Party fights him at every turn, and many Republicans join with them to derail the President’s promises to the American people.
There is nothing immoral about protecting America’s citizens although the Democrat Party claims it is. Congress passed the National Emergencies Act during the Ford administration, and nothing in the law says the President can’t use his own judgment in declaring an emergency.
President Trump has publicly warned the governments of Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala that if they don’t take steps to stop the latest caravan of bogus asylum invaders, he will cut off aid to the countries. While this is a good first step, it won’t deter the invasion unless we stop admitting the invaders and implementing catch-and-release under orders from illegitimate court rulings, as we did with the previous caravan and countless tens of thousands of others coming in with less pomp. And that would hold true even with a border wall. They just come to our points of entry, surrender themselves, get released into our communities, and never show up to their hearings until and unless they wind up committing crimes.
Our Sovereignty at Risk
Anyone who tells you that the president doesn’t have the authority to exclude anyone for any reason doesn’t deserve to live in a sovereign nation. Sovereignty trumps everything. There is nothing in our statutes that forces the president to admit anyone he feels is a problem. In fact, as Conservative Review has previously noted, he has inherent executive powers from Article II, as well as delegated authority from Congress under existing law, to stop taking in immigrants at the border or through visas for as much time as he deems necessary.
As the Supreme Court said in a landmark 1950 case, “The exclusion of aliens is a fundamental act of sovereignty. The right to do so stems not alone from legislative power but is inherent in the executive power to control the foreign affairs of the nation.”
This is why for the first 100 years of our country,
immigration was entirely controlled by diplomatic correspondence through the
State Department. The president was clearly using this authority when
communicating with the leader of the country of origin of this caravan.
Trump can simply shut the door and demand that any
legitimate asylum claims be processed through our 10 or so consulates in
Mexico. The president needs to threaten
not just Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador, but Mexico with diplomatic sanctions.
As Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, told Daniel Horowitz in an email, “The president should be leaning on Mexico and the sending nations that their facilitation of this problem is immoral, shameful, and will adversely affect our bilateral relationship.” Link
In declaring a state of emergency pursuant to the NEA, President Trump is using pre-existing statutory authority to address a legitimate crisis created by lawless conduct at and beyond our southern border. Our president is protecting our country’s borders through means contemplated by Congress and used many times by past presidents for matters less directly threatening than those present on the southern border. Link
Let the Congress critters know what you think and that you
support our President!